The Planning Board welcomed its newest member at its April 12
meeting, Ian McDonald, who said he’s excited to be joining the board.
Mr. McDonald told the Reporter, “I’ve done a lot on Shelter Island and
Shelter Island has done a lot for me since my family first came here in
1974. I try to do things for the community where I can … [Planning] is
also something that’s interesting to me in my line of work, and I’m
looking forward to being on the board for that reason.” Mr. McDonald has
been an architect since 2002 and has worked on many Island projects.
His appointment follows Peder Larsen’s February resignation. Mr.
Larsen had been on the board for five years but had to resign since he
was moving.
CASE MINOR SUBDIVISION
During the April 26 meeting, the board reviewed the final steps that
Sam Case will need to take to complete his application, including minor
changes to his proposed two-lot subdivision on North Ferry Road in the
Center and the removal of a garage and three sheds that are labeled “to
be removed.” During the April 12 meeting, board member John
D’Amato explained that these requirements are his “last set of
instructions from this board to get you through to the actual signing
and completion of the subdivision.”
NEW REVIEWS ON THE WAY
Aside from welcoming Mr. McDonald and briefly reviewing the Case
subdivision at the April 12 meeting, discussion was short. Most of the
subdivisions before the board are now in their final application stage
and need no further input from the planners. Board members joked that
they might set a record for the shortest meeting ever that night, and at
just seven minutes long, it seems they were in the running.
The light agenda is a product of the economy, Mr. McDonald suggested.
He noted a decline in the number of construction projects happening on
the Island, and in a down market, people are less likely to take on the
expense of a subdivision project, he said. “We’re going to have a series of 10-minute meetings if we don’t really start digging into something,” commented Mr. D’Amato.
Fortunately, there are still plenty of land use issues the board can review in order to advise the Town Board.
One such issue is relaxing the prohibition on impervious driveways in
the Near Shore and Peninsular Overlay District. There’s a strong
argument for doing so, according to Mr. Breiner: “If an owner is willing
to collect and recharge runoff, it makes it difficult to deny an
asphalt driveway.” Mr. McDonald and engineer Matt Sherman have been
drafting a driveway law, which the Planning Board will review after it’s
been presented to the Town Board and the Conservation Advisory Council.
The Planning Board continued its review of the Municipal Separate
Storm Sewer Systems (MS4) law at the April 12 meeting, a set of
state-mandated rules that the town must adopt. The rules have been
criticized by both Planning and Town board members alike for its lack of
applicability to the Island, though Councilman Glenn Waddington lauded
its goals during the meeting. The Planning Board is charged with
advising the Town Board on possible changes to the law and figuring out
what effect it will have on the planning process.
Another ongoing issue for the Planning Board to consider is the
effect of creating a causeway zone and changing the wetlands code to
restrict building on the causeways. After environmental consultant, Kyle
Collins, makes his initial findings, the Planning Board will resume its
discussion.
The planners will also discuss the Local Waterfront Revitalization
Program, which would bring in grants to cover 50 percent of town
projects in the plan. The board will explore whether the program is
appropriate for the Island and its implications.
Also on the horizon is a Watershed Protection Improvement District
(WPID) bill, sponsored by Assemblyman Fred Thiele of Southampton. It
allows a town to establish a WPID to protect groundwater and surface
waters through stormwater treatment projects, updated septic systems and
wetland restoration. The Planning Board must advise the town on whether
this bill would be appropriate for the Island or if the bill is
tailored to a more densely developed region, and how such projects would
be funded. |